Blog on the Run: Reloaded

Tuesday, April 15, 2014 9:30 pm

Who really won the Pulitzer Prize for public-service journalism?


It’s a more complicated question than it appears, and who better than Jay Rosen to make complicated questions of journalism easier to understand?

Officially, the prize went to The Washington Post and to the Guardian newspaper in the U.K. for reporting on the National Security Agency’s lawbreaking and overreaching, based on documents leaked by former contractor Edward Snowden.

Officially.

But this case illustrates how the process of news gathering, editing, and publishing/distribution has changed in the Internet age. The bad news, if you want to call it that, is that the Pulitzer committee hasn’t caught up yet. The good news, and we definitely want to call it that, is that those agencies that want to suppress the publication of material whose publication is in the public interest, such as the British agents who smashed the Guardian’s MacBook Pros despite knowing that Snowden’s cache of records was alive and well elsewhere on the planet and in cyberspace, haven’t caught up yet, either.

As Rosen puts it, a writer or a paper/news outlet doesn’t publish a story anymore; a system does. And if the Pulitzer committee has trouble wrapping its head around that, that’s OK. I and many other former and current journalists I know would trade a Pulitzer in a heartbeat for the chance to be able to continue performing public-service journalism at least one step ahead of those entities who would unconstitutionally and illegally suppress it.

UPDATE, 4/16: Who really won the Pulitzer Prize forĀ investigativeĀ journalism? It damn sure wasn’t ABC News.

2 Comments »

  1. Yes and no. Individual champions matter. I see both Gelbart and Greenwald as worthy of that award and they made the systems listen. I think that individual writers matter now more than ever. There are no systems without them.

    Comment by Michael Gural-Maiello — Tuesday, April 15, 2014 9:35 pm @ 9:35 pm | Reply

  2. I think that in many, perhaps most, cases, writers still do matter. (I’ve been a writer for decades; what the hell else do you expect me to say?) But in this particular instance and a subset of stories like it, a story comes to light because of the teamwork of large numbers of individuals and organizations, without any one of which the story would not have seen the light of day. I’m struggling to point to any of the agents in this story as identified by Rosen and be able to say that he/she/it wasn’t essential.

    Comment by Lex — Tuesday, April 15, 2014 10:06 pm @ 10:06 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

The Rubric Theme. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,399 other followers

%d bloggers like this: