Blog on the Run: Reloaded

Monday, November 9, 2009 8:01 pm

Legal fraud; or, Why Obama’s Justice Department is no better than Bush’s and might even be worse


Justice is taking “state-secrets” arguments even farther in a direction in which they never should have gone in the first place:

The state secrets doctrine was born on the wings of fraud and lies by the US government in the case of US v. Reynolds in 1953. As Congress struggles to rein in the unbridled use of the doctrine to cover up illegality by the Executive Branch (see here, here and here), it is a good idea to keep focus on just how addicted the Executive Branch has become to this unitary ability to quash inquiry into their malfeasance.

It took over four decades for the outright lie in Reynolds to surface and be exposed. The government was well on their way to covering up their similar dishonesty in Horn v. Huddle for decades, if not eternity, when a relentless plaintiff was finally able to demonstrate to Judge Royce Lamberth the fraud being perpetrated upon the court, nearly a decade after the original state secrets assertion. After giving the government multiple opportunities to come clean, Judge Lamberth blistered the DOJ with an opinion literally finding their acts a fraud upon the court.

After being exposed on the record by Judge Lamberth, the government suddenly decided to settle with the plaintiff, with a non-disclosure and no admission of wrongdoing agreement of course, and then moved the court to vacate its rulings against them. The DOJ literally wants to erase the record of their fraud.

I said earlier that I didn’t think the administration was playing 17-dimensional chess, that I thought they really did want to do the wrong thing. This pretty well proves it.

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: