Blog on the Run: Reloaded

Thursday, October 20, 2011 8:57 pm

Letter to Scott Nolan, general manager, WDAV-FM, re: Lisa Simeone UPDATE: … and his reply

UPDATE 2: Please click on the link below and join me in thanking President Quillen for doing the right thing. If you’d also like to thank her for making Davidson look good in the process, that’s fine, but I won’t insist on it. ;-)

UPDATE: DAMN. I had no sooner hit “send” on that email and begun copying and pasting it into the blog here when Scott Nolan called me.

Long story short, I am delighted to report that he, the station and the college are doing all the right things here for all the right reasons. They’ve reviewed the terms of their contract with NPR to provide content — i.e., the opera show Simeone produces. They have concluded that the college is in compliance with every stipulation of that contract, and they’re going to ignore the national media and keep doing what they’re doing.

It is a good day to be a Wildcat.

(As you might expect, I bcc’ed a lot of people on that email. I’ll be letting them know about this conversation immediately.)

* * *

cc: Dr. Carol Quillen, president, Davidson College


As a Davidson College alumnus and former employee of WDAV-FM during its critical early years as a high-powered broadcast outlet, I was more than a little dismayed to learn that NPR was “in conversations with WDAV about how they [sic] intend to handle” Lisa Simeone.

Here’s some free advice from someone with decades of experience in media and PR: You don’t. You listen politely to NPR, you then tell its representative to take a flying flip at a rolling doughnut and you let Ms. Simeone keep doing what she’s doing for WDAV without interruption or hassle. (If nothing else, I’m sure my late father, Class of ’52, founding member of the WDAV advisory board and a board member at Opera Carolina for about two decades, would appreciate it. He’d have loved her show, I think.)

There are so many things wrong about this situation that it’s difficult to know where to start. Fortunately, that’s exactly the kind of situation where I’ve eaten, professionally speaking, for the past 30 years.

First, if I understand the situation correctly (and I might not; I’ve seen conflicting reports in major media outlets), Lisa Simeone is a freelancer for WDAV and has no direct, formal relationship whatever with NPR anymore. That being the case, then absent any written agreement between the station and her with respect to how she will conduct herself off the air, the station simply has no jurisdiction — no moral, legal or ethical standing to tell her what she can and cannot say, what groups she can and cannot participate with, whom she can and cannot represent besides WDAV. If, going forward, the station finds it valuable to control that conduct, it is welcome to attempt to reach a contractual arrangement with her on that point and to attempt to compensate her accordingly. She, of course, is free to tell you to go to hell, and if you’re foolish enough to try to achieve that goal, then for reasons that have nothing to do with politics and everything to do with my having been a freelancer off and on for much of my career, I sincerely hope she does.

Second, although there are no true First Amendment issues here as no government agency is involved so far as I know, Davidson College and every college and university worth the name has a strong interest in defending freedom of expression, particularly unpopular expression. One of the unfortunate side effects of the evolution of the American economy from one based on manufacturing to one based on knowledge — and, therefore, frequently on relationships — is that otherwise rational people can and do sever perfectly productive professional relationships because overentitled jackasses get a bad case of butthurt over something someone said or wrote or blogged or tweeted about them. The academy, of all our institutions, ought to be the one that stands up and points out both the impracticality and the immorality of shutting down unpopular speech. If you have a problem with that, you’re welcome to seek employment in the for-profit sector. I hear it’s hiring. Oh, wait.

Third, moving from the general to the particular, what, exactly, is it of which Ms. Simeone stands accused? Depending on which news account you read, she’s guilty of being a “spokeswoman” or “organizer” for Occupy Wall Street — again, on her own time, separate and apart from her work for WDAV. Unfortunately, neither NPR nor anyone else has bothered to explain exactly what that even means, let alone why it’s a bad thing. Moreover, from everything I’ve read or heard about Occupy Wall Street and its offshoots (including first-hand accounts from my brother and sister-in-law in Raleigh, friends here in Greensboro, friends in New York and other participants), one of its defining characteristics is that anyone who wants to be can be an “organizer” or “spokesperson” for the movement. It’s a consensus movement, not a hierarchical one. While that might not bode well for its political effectiveness, it also makes defining moral and ethical transgressions on the part of any one participant problematic when we’re talking about an act of speech as opposed to, say, defecating on a police car. Put another way, the terms are meaningless. Two nights ago, as a joke, I created the Twitter hashtag #LWS — Liquidate Wall Street. (This was before Bloomberg Business News broke the story that Bank of America intends to try to stick taxpayers with a looming $53 TRILLION loss on its derivatives; in 24 hours, Liquidate Wall Street evolved with no effort on my part from joke to logical policy proposal, but that’s a different subject altogether.) Does my having created that hashtag make me an “organizer” or “spokesman” for the Liquidate Wall Street movement? If so, neither I nor the movement appear to be deriving much benefit.

Finally, I would point out something that I hope already has become obvious to you in your dealings with NPR: In matters relating to politics — a subject on which its news coverage purports to have some expertise — NPR cannot find its own ass with both hands and a flashlight. It has mishandled every major story of the past decade related to important political issues, from war crimes to the economy, health care to regulation. Probably not coincidentally, it has failed to recognize that it is facing ongoing, coordinated political attacks from one and only one side of the aisle that are bent on destroying it because they are bent on destroying accountability journalism entirely. I have been a registered Republican since 1978, but even I am not blind to this phenomenon, nor do I care for the likely national consequences if this effort succeeds. NPR is blind, willingly or otherwise, but you need not let your affiliation with the network blind you, too.

What you do, or choose not to do, is up to you. But you need to understand that your actions and those of the college in whose name you operate will be watched carefully and interpreted in the context of the values for which this country and Davidson College purport to stand.


Hooper “Lex” Alexander IV ’82
Greensboro, NC


  1. Thank you Lex!
    Thank you Scott Nolan!
    from another proud wildcat,
    Charlie Martof ’80

    Comment by C Martof — Friday, October 21, 2011 1:29 am @ 1:29 am

  2. Charles, THANKS, Charlie. I appreciate the kind words.

    Comment by Lex — Friday, October 21, 2011 8:27 am @ 8:27 am

  3. Lex, kudos for stepping up. I too fully expected Davidson to do the right thing.

    – Michael

    Comment by Michael — Friday, October 21, 2011 3:21 pm @ 3:21 pm

  4. Thanks, Michael. It’s just sad when doing the right thing becomes newsworthy rather than the status quo.

    Comment by Lex — Friday, October 21, 2011 3:43 pm @ 3:43 pm

  5. Yes, exactly. The obtuseness and cowardice of the various blog posts at NPR on this (non) issue boggles the mind. I’m so old that I remember NPR when it was not craven back in the ’70s.

    Comment by Michael — Friday, October 21, 2011 3:50 pm @ 3:50 pm

  6. Way to go Lex! Well-crafted letter. Thanks for posting. – Mary Carpenter Class of 1983

    Comment by Mary Carpenter — Friday, October 21, 2011 4:53 pm @ 4:53 pm

  7. Thanks, Mary!

    In my unceasing efforts to find ways to procrastinate on stats homework (I’m in grad school), I stumbled across the original report on this in Roll Call and emailed the reporter, pointing out that her snide tone was inappropriate inasmuch as what she had written was factually inaccurate and all. She wrote back to say that she had Ms. Simeone on tape, which was a bit of a non sequitur, so I followed up by attacking her literacy as well as her journalism skills. I’m eagerly awaiting her response and will post the whole exchange here. I only have a few dozen readers most days, but because I was briefly Almost Famous in the news biz about five years ago, some of them are kind of influential. This could be fun.

    Comment by Lex — Friday, October 21, 2011 8:14 pm @ 8:14 pm

  8. Good stuff. Can’t wait for the book, “Two Hands and a Flashlight.”

    Comment by waitress — Saturday, October 22, 2011 12:47 am @ 12:47 am

  9. Lex: Bravo – and my support, from a distant country, to Lisa Simeone. It sounds as if the College has done the right thing. As someone formerly given (very) occasional squatting rights in front of the WDAV desk, I’m glad to hear that those in charge don’t shirk their responsiblities.
    How ’bout them Cats . . . (as we say over here in England) . . .

    Comment by Nick — Saturday, October 22, 2011 9:09 am @ 9:09 am

  10. @waitress: Yes, the eagerly-awaited sequel to “‘No,’ He Said, Bitterly.”

    @Nick: Thanks much, mate. Haven’t heard much from you lately — hope all is well.

    Comment by Lex — Saturday, October 22, 2011 11:24 am @ 11:24 am

  11. There is a facebook page that would welcome your input.

    Comment by RockingJamboree (@RockingJamboree) — Sunday, October 23, 2011 10:11 am @ 10:11 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Create a free website or blog at

%d bloggers like this: