Blog on the Run: Reloaded

Wednesday, May 30, 2012 8:00 pm

That’s going to leave a mark

Paul Ryan, who gets way more credit than he deserves for even being able to count, let alone devise a deficit-reduction plan that actually, you know, reduces the deficit, says something remarkably ahistorical here:

We wonder if we will be the first generation in American history to leave our children with fewer opportunities and a less prosperous nation than the one we inherited.

Paul, son, never leave a curve ball hanging out over the plate like that, because if you do, Charlie Pierce is going to take you downtown:

Can this possibly be true? Didn’t parents in the depth of the Depression wonder the same thing? Didn’t the mothers and fathers who worked in the coal mines in the early years of the 20th century see pretty much the same future for their children and grandchildren? Didn’t the farmers ground up in the Panics of 1873 and 1837 — to name only two major events that occurred while the country pursued the policies that Ryan’s “budget” so deeply flattered — feel pretty damned hopeless of what would happen to their kids? Didn’t we ship kids west from the cities on orphan trains? Wasn’t this the normal state of affairs for generation after generation of African Americans?

You know when people began to feel that they could leave their children with more opportunities than they had? When government got involved, that’s when, and when common people began to feel that the government was on their side, and not the wholly owned subsidiary of the wealthy and the privileged. The farmers started to feel it when the Morrill Act established land grant colleges. The miners began to feel it when unionization fought to make their jobs slightly less hellish and when government got behind that effort. The farmers began to feel it when the Progressives began to force change at the beginning of the last century. Everybody felt it with the election of Franklin Roosevelt and the defeat of Hooverian economics, for which Paul Ryan seems overly nostalgic. And that feeling really took off in the 1950’s, when government passed the GI Bill and built the interstate highways, and made college affordable generally to the children and grandchildren of the people who won World War II like, say, me. And when we recognized that the death of a parent need not blight the hopes and dreams of his children, who would be allowed the opportunity of an education through the survivor benefits provided by Social Security, like, say, Paul Ryan was. The notion that we will leave a brighter day for our kids is a relatively recent phenomenon, and it is one that was not possible without the intervention of the government, and it is one from which Paul Ryan profited so handsomely that he is now in a position to claim a “moral obligation” to deny it to everyone else. What a country.

Man, that felt almost as good as hearing about bin Laden.


  1. Puleeze ! Esquire? Good grief. I didn’t realize it was stil published. Who reads it. Same types that read Nation, no doubt.

    What utter class warfare drivel squeezed from the lower
    intestine of a horse.

    Charles Pierce’s photo is in the Webster’s dictionunder the word hack ( left wing ) . He has all the characteristics of a small cat.

    Here is where it’s at. There is more available at you tube. Soak it in . Feel good !

    Comment by Fred Gregory — Thursday, May 31, 2012 9:14 pm @ 9:14 pm

  2. Put Ryan through the Liberal BS Filter/translator and what you get is:
    Be afraid very afraid. The country may be worse for your children. Be so afraid that you let me enact my plan to make it that way.

    Comment by LiberalTalkingPoints — Saturday, June 2, 2012 1:12 am @ 1:12 am

  3. Excuse me . Huh ? This Pierce flop was truly a nominee for their ” Dubious Achivement Award ” Check Mate !

    Comment by Fred Gregory — Saturday, June 2, 2012 1:21 am @ 1:21 am

  4. The protesting amps up when the whip comes down on the mark! Pierce was right and you sir Fred are wrong. Got something to bring other than diatribe and names? Probably not.

    Comment by LiberalTalkingPoints — Monday, June 4, 2012 4:58 pm @ 4:58 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Create a free website or blog at

%d bloggers like this: