Blog on the Run: Reloaded

Sunday, August 3, 2014 3:49 pm

Well, on torture, Obama is now officially As Bad As Bush

Jesus wept:

Even before I came into office, I was very clear that in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, we did some things that were wrong. We did a whole lot of things that were right, but we tortured some folks. We did some things that were contrary to our values. I understand why it happened. I think it’s important when we look back to recall how afraid people were after the twin towers fell and the Pentagon had been hit and the plane in Pennsylvania had fallen and people did not know whether more attacks were imminent and there was enormous pressure on our law enforcement and our national security teams to try to deal with this. And, you know, it’s important for us not to feel too sanctimonious in retrospect about the tough job that those folks had. A lot of those folks were working hard under enormous pressure and are real patriots, but having said all that, we did some things that were wrong. And that’s what that report reflects.

A mid-level Bush functionary? No. That’s the current president of the United States, a man who, just weeks into his presidency, described waterboarding as torture.

What a craven, morally bankrupt speech. From the incongruous use of “folks” to describe people against whom the United States of America committed violations of U.S. and international law, to the point of death in dozens of instances, to the condescending notion that in the immediate wake of 9/11 we were all so deathly terrified that we would have thrown any and all moral and constitutional principles aside for the sake of a false assurance of safety, this is a morally toxic pile of bullshit. And it’s even more offensive, coming as it does from the same president who told graduating West Point cadets in 2010:

A fundamental part of our strategy for our security has to be America’s support for those universal rights that formed the creed of our founding. And we will promote these values above all by living them — through our fidelity to the rule of law and our Constitution, even when it’s hard; even when we’re being attacked; even when we’re in the midst of war.

Now, however, we get, “But we were SKEERED!” and “It’s important for us not to feel too sanctimonious.” These comments are the ashes of our last remaining hope that this president, twice elected against one addled former war hero and one stone-cold sociopath, might, in his grappling with perhaps the most difficult ethical quandary a U.S. president has faced since Hiroshima, finally lead us down the path of righteousness. The reason he doesn’t want to look back is that his view in that direction is objectively wrong. Some of us — many of us, in fact — were saying AT THE TIME that it was important to preserve our humane values, such as they were, while pursuing the 9/11 perps, even as we feared that the crew in power was about the last group in the country likely to do that. We were right then; we are right now.

What prompted these remarks was the report by the CIA inspector general that, contrary to all previous assurances, the CIA had, in fact, hacked the computers of congressional staffers tasked with overseeing the CIA. Yet this president, who should be firing John Brennan and referring his case to the Justice Department’s criminal division, instead is defending him and his agency, not only against the current crimes (the CIA is barred by law from domestic operations, in addition to laws banning hacking without a warrant) but also against its previous war crimes. By the way, Brennan played a role in those, too; Obama never should have nominated him in the first place.

Torture is never right. Not ever. It is illegal, immoral, and ineffective. We waterboarded people? Dear God, so did Japanese military leaders during WWII, and you know what we call them now? Executed war criminals.

This president needs to get rid of John Brennan today. (And if he won’t and the House is really hot to impeach somebody, they could do a lot worse than to start with Brennan.) And despite having saddled himself with the worst attorney general since John Mitchell, he needs to direct that AG to open a criminal investigation of torture, focused not on the Lynndie Englands of the world but on those who gave the orders. We are bound by U.S. and international law to do so, and if the law means anything anymore — an open question, I admit — then we have no other choice.

“Looking forward, not back,” this president’s mantra, hasn’t worked. And looking forward won’t work until we look back, in anger and sorrow, come to terms with what we did, and make at least some sincere effort toward atoning for it. Following the laws to which we as a country were willing signatories is the bare minimum, but right now I’d settle even for that. Otherwise, this stuff will only happen again, and next time it will be worse, because, as history teaches us, the next time is always worse.


  1. He’s a “progressive” torturer — he thinks it’s not “practical” to end it completely, but he reached a “compromise” with the torturers to reform their methods to be more “humane”. Nothing exposes the hollowness of present-day liberal “human rights” rhetoric more than these efforts at “torture reform”.

    I’ll be impressed once Obama says something like “We tortured hundreds, perhaps thousands of people, and we’re going to shut down ALL of the facilities immediately, and bring all of the US torturers to justice (including the government officials who oversaw it).” … But I’m not holding my breath.

    Comment by Jesse Taylor — Monday, August 4, 2014 12:36 am @ 12:36 am

  2. Well said, Lex. This will be our generation’s greatest disgrace. We don’t yet fully comprehend the depths or our moral failings. The past decade has made a mockery of land of the free, home of the brave.

    Comment by Roch — Monday, August 4, 2014 9:46 am @ 9:46 am

  3. @Jesse: Nor am I, more’s the pity. Thanks for commenting. @Roch: Thank you, sir. At this point, I think you’re right that this will be our generation’s greatest disgrace, but I don’t rule out the possibility that something else — gross misfeasance on climate change, say — might, in some way, become even more disgraceful. With respect to evil, after watching what has happened to this country post-9/11, my imagination has gotten a lot greater, as in, I no longer say or think, “Oh, I can’t imagine that they would do X.” Hell, at this point, irrespective of the value of X, I’d likely put some money on it.

    Comment by Lex — Monday, August 4, 2014 12:46 pm @ 12:46 pm

  4. Uh, baiting Putin at the risk of thermonuclear Armageddon ranks right up there for me. Great post.

    Comment by Jeff — Monday, August 4, 2014 10:34 pm @ 10:34 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Create a free website or blog at

%d bloggers like this: