Blog on the Run: Reloaded

Wednesday, August 31, 2016 7:31 pm

Kaepernick, cont.: Bleacher Report says team execs hate him


I have mixed feelings on this Bleacher Report story by Mike Freeman:

Across NFL front offices, there are team officials who are not offended, and even embrace, the controversial position of Colin Kaepernick. They are out there. Statistically, they have to be. But they are keeping a low profile.

They seem to be far outnumbered by the members of NFL front offices who despise him. Truly, truly hate him.

“I don’t want him anywhere near my team,” one front office executive said. “He’s a traitor.”

A traitor?

He wasn’t alone in the anger directed toward Kaepernick. In interviews with seven team executives, each said he didn’t want Kaepernick on his team. This is far from scientific, but I believe this is likely the feeling among many front office executives. Not all. But many.

All seven estimated 90 to 95 percent of NFL front offices felt the same way they did. One executive said he hasn’t seen this much collective dislike among front office members regarding a player since Rae Carruth. Remember Rae Carruth? He’s still in prison for the plot to murder his pregnant girlfriend.

Personally, I think the dislike of Kaepernick is inappropriate and un-American. I find it ironic that citizens who live in a country whose existence is based on dissent criticize someone who expresses dissent.

But in NFL front offices, the feeling is very different.

The story goes on like that for a good bit longer, letting one exec after another take some often-ridiculous potshots at Kaepernick, who refused to stand during the national anthem at last Friday’s 49ers-Packers game in protest of police violence toward people of color.

So, let’s take these executives’ complaints about Kaepernick at face value and analyze them, starting with the executive quoted above:

  • “He’s a traitor.” Well, no, he’s not. Treason is the only crime defined in the Constitution, and the Constitution defines it as making war against the United States or giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Kapernick is guilty of neither.
  • “”He has no respect for our country. F— that guy.” I’m not sure how this exec became a mind reader, but let’s assume for a second that he’s correct. Given the real and documented nature of the problem about which Kaepernick is complaining, why should he respect this country, which asserts it offers “liberty and justice for all” but which in practice has a long way to go before that will be true?
  • “Another said that if an owner asked him to sign Kaepernick, he would consider resigning, rather than do it.” No reason given, but I wonder how this exec feels about signing domestic abusers and dogfighters.
  • ” (Executives) also don’t believe he appreciates what he has. Many of them pointed to Kaepernick’s salary and said he would never make that kind of money if not for football.” What the hell does that have to do with anything? Kaepernick made it very clear that he was speaking in support of people of color generally, not just for himself. He was using a platform that he has that most people of color do not. Do league executives, who famously don’t give up a penny not called for in the contract, actually think that paying a player buys his silence on topics of which team execs do not approve?

Granted, not many direct quotes here, but what quotes there are don’t seem to come from a place of reflection or even logic.

Now, I’m glad that Freeman did this story. It’s good to know how at least some league execs feel. But I have some problems with it as well.

For one thing, we have only Freeman’s word that it’s in any way representative of team execs around the league. Seven is a very small sample.

But more damningly, I think it was unethical of Freeman to grant these men (I’m certain they were all men) anonymity in order to hurl their invective at Kaepernick. If these guys felt as strongly as Freeman would have us believe, certainly they’d have been willing to go on the record. And if they weren’t willing, then that calls into question just how right they actually think they are.

Which leads us to the question of what, exactly, is going through these executives’ minds. We hate what we fear. Are these execs really afraid of what would happen if this country, as Kaepernick suggested, got serious about erasing racial discrimination, especially in law enforcement? Or, on a more basic level, are they just afraid of people of color in general?

Either way, such fear not only is not grounded in reality, it’s un-American. The NFL makes a big deal about being the most patriotic of our national sports, but its executives would appear to have a lot to learn about the ideals on which this country was really founded and what it takes to make those ideals real.

 

 

Advertisements

7 Comments »

  1. How ironic that they are willing to anonymously criticize his dissent but not a single one of them has ever spoken out against the police brutality that has been killing their future, potential moneymakers, like Tamir Rice, and Michael Brown.
    You’d think they speak up to at least protect their future profit makers. They can’t play and make money for your team if they’re dead.

    Comment by lkeke35 — Wednesday, August 31, 2016 7:38 pm @ 7:38 pm | Reply

    • Good point.

      Comment by Lex — Wednesday, August 31, 2016 10:14 pm @ 10:14 pm | Reply

  2. […] SOURCE […]

    Pingback by Kaepernick, cont.: Bleacher Report says team execs hate him | Greensboro 101 — Wednesday, August 31, 2016 8:09 pm @ 8:09 pm | Reply

  3. You know, I can just come over here and keep the thread going. ;)

    Other than saying I’m wrong and not correct, you utterly failed to respond to my specifics. It’s not just about generalizations. It’s about this specific generalization. You’re right, there is a connection between the people and law enforcement. But saying that everybody is a racist and oppressor and that all law enforcement is racist and oppressive is incorrect. It’s wrong and it is counter-productive. You’ve yet to explain how it is productive to make that generalization. How making that generalization helps advance the discussion.

    Oh wait, you’re not interested in a discussion. People are supposed to just sit down and shut up. And you can just shut comments down when you’re done, even though you did nothing other just tell me I’m wrong. Because you’re right and everybody else is wrong. What arrogance.

    Comment by kingmidget — Thursday, September 1, 2016 9:54 am @ 9:54 am | Reply

    • I don’t think everybody’s wrong. I think you are. And as you have added absolutely nothing to the conversation over at least your last six or eight posts, I’m done. ‘Bye, now.

      Comment by Lex — Thursday, September 1, 2016 9:57 am @ 9:57 am | Reply

  4. Well at I atleast respect his opinion on this subject

    Comment by Fred Gregory — Thursday, September 1, 2016 6:57 pm @ 6:57 pm | Reply

    • You’re not alone, but that’s a subject for another thread.

      Comment by Lex — Thursday, September 1, 2016 9:22 pm @ 9:22 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: