Blog on the Run: Reloaded

Wednesday, November 27, 2013 5:11 pm

Happy Thanksgiving, coming Chinese crash edition

Filed under: I want my country back.,We're so screwed — Lex @ 5:11 pm
Tags: ,

Hooboy:

China’s shadow banking system is out of control and under mounting stress as borrowers struggle to roll over short-term debts, Fitch Ratings has warned.

The agency said the scale of credit was so extreme that the country would find it very hard to grow its way out of the excesses as in past episodes, implying tougher times ahead.

“The credit-driven growth model is clearly falling apart. This could feed into a massive over-capacity problem, and potentially into a Japanese-style deflation,” said Charlene Chu, the agency’s senior director in Beijing.

“There is no transparency in the shadow banking system, and systemic risk is rising. We have no idea who the borrowers are, who the lenders are, and what the quality of assets is, and this undermines signalling,” she told The Daily Telegraph.

While the non-performing loan rate of the banks may look benign at just 1pc, this has become irrelevant as trusts, wealth-management funds, offshore vehicles and other forms of irregular lending make up over half of all new credit. “It means nothing if you can off-load any bad asset you want. A lot of the banking exposure to property is not booked as property,” she said.

Concerns are rising after a string of upsets in Quingdao, Ordos, Jilin and elsewhere, in so-called trust products, a $1.4 trillion (£0.9 trillion) segment of the shadow banking system. …

Fitch warned that wealth products worth $2 trillion of lending are in reality a “hidden second balance sheet” for banks, allowing them to circumvent loan curbs and dodge efforts by regulators to halt the excesses. …

Overall credit has jumped from $9 trillion to $23 trillion since the Lehman crisis. “They have replicated the entire US commercial banking system in five years,” she said.

The ratio of credit to GDP has jumped by 75 percentage points to 200pc of GDP, compared to roughly 40 points in the US over five years leading up to the subprime bubble, or in Japan before the Nikkei bubble burst in 1990. “This is beyond anything we have ever seen before in a large economy. We don’t know how this will play out. The next six months will be crucial,” she said.

This makes a systemic Chinese crash on the order of what we had here in 2008-09 look likely. What the effects will be on the global economy I can’t say, but I imagine it can’t be good.

And this, folks, is why we need a transparent, well-regulated banking and investment system. Yet “too big to fail” and a huge, unregulated segment of the financial markets are still standard policy here in the U.S. If the system breaks again, the hyperrich won’t suffer, but you and I will. Big time.

Happy Thanksgiving.

(h/t: Fec)

 

 

Advertisements

Sunday, November 22, 2009 10:10 am

His judgment cometh, and that right early not a damn second too soon

We wouldn’t be in the situation we’re in now without the credit-rating agencies — Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch. And people are beginning to figure that out:

Already facing a spate of private lawsuits, the legal troubles of the country’s largest credit rating agencies deepened on Friday when the attorney general of Ohio sued Moody’s Investors Service, Standard & Poor’s and Fitch, claiming that they had cost state retirement and pension funds some $457 million by approving high-risk Wall Street securities that went bust in the financial collapse.

The case could test whether the agencies’ ratings are constitutionally protected as a form of free speech.

The lawsuit asserts that Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s and Fitch were in league with the banks and other issuers, helping to create an assortment of exotic financial instruments that led to a disastrous bubble in the housing market.

“We believe that the credit rating agencies, in exchange for fees, departed from their objective, neutral role as arbiters,” the attorney general, Richard Cordray, said at a news conference. “At minimum, they were aiding and abetting misconduct by issuers.”

He accused the companies of selling their integrity to the highest bidder.

Remember, we’re dealing with a setup in which companies pay the ratings agencies to rate their stuff. No conflict of interest there.

And I’d like to think that this will be a slam dunk for the plaintiffs. But the system is so rigged that I suspect it won’t. Hell, if a TV station can’t be held liable for broadcasting false news, what makes you think a bankster is going to have to pay a dime for screwing people?

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: