Blog on the Run: Reloaded

Saturday, May 22, 2010 5:18 pm

Wrapping himself in the Constitution

Spencer Ackerman, not normally a huge Obama critic, nails it:

[In his commencement address at West Point, the president says:]

A fundamental part of our strategy for our security has to be America’s support for those universal rights that formed the creed of our founding. And we will promote these values above all by living them — through our fidelity to the rule of law and our Constitution, even when it’s hard; even when we’re being attacked; even when we’re in the midst of war.

And this is what kills me, because it’s so apt a diagnosis and so foreign from what Obama’s presidency is actually pursuing. “Fidelity to the rule of law and our Constitution, even when it’s hard” would cause Attorney General Holder to refuse to create a framework from indefinite detention without charge — perhaps the least American idea there is — rather than assenting to it under pressure from Sen. Graham. There would be no inexplicable expansions of exemptions within Miranda after a 53-hour law-enforcement manhunt immediately produces intelligence cooperation from an American citizen-turned-extremist. And there would most certainly be no assertions of the right to execute an American citizen without due process of law on mere suspicion of involvement with small men on the wrong side of history. Actually, come to think of it, that’s the least American idea there is.

There would be no embrace of the military commissions, and certainly no prosecution under them of someone who as a 15-year old allegedly threw a grenade that killed an American soldier — heinous, but clearly a traditional battlefield act — for a war crime. There would be no calculation that the path to closing down the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay involves embracing the commissions and indefinite detention without charge. There would be no equivocation that the best venue for trying the men responsible for plunging us into this Constitutional dark age is the civilian courts that have proven so successful at dispensing internationally-recognized justice. And there would be no hectoring of the civil liberties community for being naive enough to believe that the Constitutional principles Obama espoused as a candidate — and, every now and then, in speeches like this — are indeed necessary and sufficient to guide us out of that dark age.

Instead, if it’s true that he will promote these values above all by living them, then he is simply not promoting them. I’ll leave it to you to determine if Obama is not promoting them at all or not promoting them as much as I’d like, as I try to be humble enough to remember there is a distinction there. But remember what the argument on offer here is from the president: American values are necessary sources of positive-sum international action, and the promotion of American values begins with our demonstrated fidelity to them. So we are depleting our own stated strength.

Some sunshine patriots wrap themselves in the flag. But it’s just as cynical to wrap yourself in the Constitution.

This goes to the heart of why so many of us were not just so opposed to George W. Bush’s policies but also so angry at him: While claiming to protect what was good about America, he actually was diligently undermining it on every front. (And for the unpardonable sin of being right, we were accused of having Bush Derangement Syndrome, but that’s a subject for another post.)

Now Obama is doing the same thing — indeed, in arguing that he can legally hold indefinitely someone acquitted of all charges and assassinate American citizens without charge or trial, he has gone even further astray from the Constitution than Bush.

(And those of us who opposed Bush lose either way. If we say nothing, we’re just “Obamabots” or partisan Democrats, and if we say anything, we’re ridiculed for having supporting Obama over John “More of the Same” McCain in the first place. Oh, well. In so many ways, it ain’t about us.)

Tuesday, May 4, 2010 6:33 am

Thought for the day

… from the, frankly, not-always-so-sensible Peter Beinart:

For a year now, Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck and their minions have been warning that America is morphing into a police state. … So where are Palin and Beck, those latter-day Paul Reveres, now that Governor Jan Brewer is doing to the southwest what President Barack Obama supposedly hopes to do to the nation?

Monday, November 23, 2009 6:06 am


TO: Bishop Thomas Tobin
DATE: 11/23/09
RE: Priorities

Dude. You need to worry a lot more about people without adequate food and health care, and about bringing pedophile priests to justice, than you need to worry about the voting habits of one politician.

Just sayin’.

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: